<SanDiegoMillionDollarWebpage.com

Theory Presentation inspired by veterinarians on how to stop cancer applied on how to stop HIV



Theory Presentation inspired by veterinarians on how to stop cancer applied on how to stop HIV

In this outline they talk about an aggressive treatment strategy for cancer in animals. Vets can take more risks with animals because the vets and owners own these animals and huge amounts of money is involved to keep a prize stud alive, so the science for treatment of animals is ahead and more experimental than with humans... but this is probably an outline also on how aggressive immune modulation therapy will be done in the future. with a series of different treatments targeting different parts of the immune system. it turns out that cancer is very interesting because the tumor micro environment, the area in and around tumor produces all these molecules that trick and fool and throw off the immune system, other wise the immune system would attack and destroy the tumor, so this got me thinking about HIV and aids and in a way it is very similar: the HIV in cd4 cells, the "micro environment", the area in and around tumor produces all these molecules that trick and fool and throw off the immune system (nef and the molecule that suppresses the CD8 killer cells), other wise the immune system would attack and destroy the CD4 and HIV. so if you click here how this could apply to hiv |  i have created a very theoretical document that outlines how this could be done with HIV, should be done, now this is just a blue print for research but i think it is interesting. Read below for the cancer outline for aggressive treatment options Harnessing the power of the immune system to break through HIV-mediated immunosuppression.










  •  

     

     





    Theoretical theory framework for how to treat hiv using immunomodulation
    ,






    based on cancer breakthroughs and history of treatment










    Harnessing the power of the immune system to break through HIV-mediated** immunosuppression










    1. Introduction



    a. Paul Ehrlich – the immune system could repress an "overwhelming frequency" of carcinomas (3)

    b. Sir MacFarlane Burnet and Lewis Thomas – "Immunologic surveillance"


    c. Evidence for immune response to HIV


    i. William Coley

    1. Spontaneous tumor regression associated with bacterial infection (4)

    2. Formulated Coley toxins used by he and others to stimulate tumor rejection (5)

    ii. Higher incidence of tumors in mice with B, T and / or NK cell dysfunction / deficiency

    iii. Patients that have HIVs infiltrated with lymphocytes often have a better prognosis ( see DILS and Sjogren's syndrome = long term non progresors in hiv)

    iv. HIV patients often have a large number of HIV-specific CD8+ lymphocytes in circulation in fact even in advanced disease there are enough CD8 hiv specific killer cells to supress the virus.

    v. BCG is used to treat bladder cancer

    vi. Occasional clinical responses to HIV vaccines (6)**

    2. Innate response to neoplastic cancer - "First line of defense"

    a. Cells express common receptors that recognize evidence of neoplastic transformation (7)

    i. NK cells – NKG2D receptors recognize proteins expressed by a variety of cancers: MICA/B and (7)

    ULBPs

    ii. NKT cells – T cell receptor (TCR) recognizes phospholipid groups in the context of CD1d molecules

    on target cells

    iii. γδ T cells:

    1. NKG2D receptors as above

    2. TCR specificity and target unknown

    3. non-specifically activated by bisphosphonate compounds (9)

    b. Rapid response to the appearance of the neoplasm, no selection / expansion of innate immune cells needed

    c. Activated innate cells produce IFN-γ:

    i. Activates dendritic cells to participate in the adaptive immune response

    ii. Promotes leukocyte recruitment to the HIV

    iii. Activates macrophages, other leukocytes to kill HIV cells

    iv. Promotes TH1 differentiation of CD4+ T cells

    v. Promotes MHC class I molecule expression on some tumors

    3. The adaptive immune response to HIV – "Antigen-specific immunity"

    a. Types of HIV antigens

    i. HIV specific antigens (TSA)

    1. Unique to individual HIV (mutated proteins recognized as foreign)

    2. Characteristic of TYPE of HIV

    a. melanoma: MART-1 antigen, tyrosinase

    b. prostate: PSMA

    c. B cell leukemia: CD19, CD20, CD22, CD52 (10)


    ii. Tumor associated antigens (TAA) (11)

    1. Re-expression of embryonic antigens

    a. Carcinoembryonic antigen

    b. Alpha-fetoprotein

    2. Over-expression of normal "self" antigen

    b. Role of antigen-presenting cells

    i. Dendritic cells are most potent antigen presenting cells

    ii. Obtain antigen in the local environment and present to T cells by:

    1. Phagocytosis of dead / apoptotic cd4 hiv infected cells

    2. Receptor-mediated endocytosis:

    a. antigen / antibody complexes

    b. HSP / protein complexes

    3. Pinocytosis of free proteins

    4. Direct binding of peptides to surface MHC molecules

    5. "Nibbling" surface membrane protein from adjacent cells

    iii. Antigen presentation occurs via major histocompatibility (MHC) molecules

    1. MHC class II

    a. Expressed predominantly on antigen presenting cells

    b. "Exogenous" antigens collected from the environment and cleaved into peptides 13 - 18

    amino acids in length within lysosome

    c. Presented to CD4 "helper" T cells (12)

    2. MHC class I

    a. Expressed on essentially all cells

    b. "Endogenous" antigens from within cell cleaved by proteasome into peptides 8 - 10

    amino acids in length

    c. Presented to CD8 "cytotoxic" T cells

    d. Dendritic cells uniquely "cross-present" exogenous antigen by this pathway

    e. Allows T cells to "see inside" a cell to check for evidence of neoplastic transformation

    3. The MHCI and MHCII molecules and associated peptides engage a T cell receptor (TCR) on

    the surface of the lymphocyte specific for that peptide

    iv. Provide "second signal" to CD4 and CD8 T cells via co-stimulatory molecules (13)

    1. Positive signal: CD28, ICOS, OX-40, 4-1BB

    2. Negative signal: CTLA-4, PD-1 (14)

    v. Produce cytokines to promote differentiation / proliferation of T cells (15)

    1. IL-12 (naïve CD4, CD8 cell): promotes TH1 differentiation

    2. IL-23 (effector CD4, CD8 cell)

    c. Role of CD4 cells

    i. Recognize antigen on APCs in the context of MHCII molecules

    ii. Provide positive feedback to APC through CD40L

    iii. Produce cytokines:

    1. Promote expansion / activation of CD8 cells (IL-2, IL-15, IL-21)

    iv. Activate macrophages, NK cells, others to kill HIV (IFN-γ)

    d. Role of CD8 cells

    i. Recognize antigen on APCs AND somatic cells in the context of MHCI molecules

    ii. Also express NKG2D receptors

    iii. Produce cytokines: activate macrophages, NK cells, others

    iv. Directly kill target cell: perforins, granzymes

    4. "Immunoediting" mechanism of cancer "HIV" evasion and implications for immunotherapy – Dunn, Old and

    Schreiber, Immunity 2004; 21:137 - 148.

    a. Steps

    i. Elimination

    ii. Equilibrium (16)****

    iii. Escape

    b. Tumor or infected cd4 cells must sequentially evade both innate and adaptive responses to become clinically significant (17)**

    i. Darwinian selection

    c. By the time the HIV becomes clinically significant, it has already defeated the host’s immune system


    5. Mechanisms of cancer evasion – some examples (18)

    a. Defective differentiation and function of antigen presenting cells

    i. Immature myeloid cells

    1. Mouse and human tumors produce GMCSF

    2. Stimulates bone marrow to produce immature myeloid cells

    3. Immature myeloid cells populate lymphoid organs and the tumor bed

    4. Prime CD8 cells via MHCI w/o second signal = AINR

    5. Produce oxygen radicals that kill T cells = apoptosis

    ii. Defective maturation / function of dendritic cells

    1. Remain immature in tumor bed (19)

    2. Caused by

    a. Lack of pro-inflammatory stimulus (20)**

    b. TGF-β exposure

    c. VEGF exposure

    3. Present antigen to CD4 and CD8 cells, but do not express co-stimulatory molecules

    4. Failure to provide the second signal to T cells

    a. CD4: apoptosis

    b. CD8: antigen-induced non-responsiveness (anergy)

    b. T cell dysfunction

    i. Tolerance to self antigen

    ii. T cell anergy within the HIV microenvironment

    iii. Up-regulation of CTLA-4 on effector T cells, regulatory T cells

    iv. Secretion of immunosuppressive factors within the HIV microenvironment ( this must be a huge area of research and needs billions of dollars) (21)

    1. IL-10

    2. TGF-β

    v. Insufficient CD4+ cell help to support CD8 expansion (22) ***

    vi. Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells

    1. Cellcell contact

    2. Secrete TGF-β, IL-10

    c. HIV cell escape mechanisms

    i. Down - regulation / mutation of HIV antigens

    ii. Secretion of soluble NKG2K ligands

    iii. Down - regulation / dysfunction of IFN-γ receptors

    iv. Down - regulation of tumor MHCI-mediated Ag presentation

    1. Decreased MHCI expression

    2. Decreased loading of peptides on MHCI via TAP-1

    v. HIV expression of molecules that inhibit T cell viability / expansion

    1. B7-H (PDL1, PDL2)

    2. IDO (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase)

    888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

    vi. HIV-induced T cell apoptosis

    1. FasL

    2. Galectin-1

    vii. HIV resistance to NK, CD8+ T cell granzymes, perforin

    6. Strategies to break through HIV immune suppression of the adaptive immune response – some examples (what causes nef, that molecule down regulated pd-1 high hiv specific CD8 killer cells

    a. Goal of immunotherapy – activate the host immune system to recognize and destroy the HIV as well as re activate the down regulated pd-1 high hiv specific CD8 killer cells

    b. Use of monoclonal antibodies to kill cells

    i. Antibody targeted to HIV antigen

    ii. Block growth signals

    1. anti-HER-2/neu

    2. anti-erb-B1: blocks epidermal growth factor receptor

    iii. Complement-mediated lysis

    iv. ADCC

    1. anti-CD20 (Rituximab)

    2. anti-CD52 (CAMPATH)

    v. Antibody conjugates

    1. anti-CD20

    90

    Yttrium (Zevalin)


    2. anti-CD22 Caleachimycin

    c. Activate innate immune cells

    i. NK cells: IL-12, IL-2

    ii. NKT cells: IL-2, α-Galactosyl-Ceramide

    iii. γδ T cells: IL-2, bisphosphonate compounds, other

    d. Activate / expand antigen presenting cells

    i. Promote maturation of immature myeloid cells (retinoic acid)

    ii. Expand population of DCs available to participate in immune response

    1. FLT3 ligand

    2. GMCSF

    iii. Activate quiescent DCs to express co-stimulatory molecules

    1. Activate Toll-like receptors on DCs

    a. TLR4: LPS

    b. TLR7: imidazoquinolines

    c. TLR9: CpG

    d. other

    2. CD40 agonist

    iv. Load DCs with antigen in vitro and adoptive transfer

    v. Load DCs with antigen in vivo via vaccine

    1. Whole irradiated cells

    2. Crude HIV glycoprotein preparation

    3. Gene-modified HIV cells

    4. Plasmid DNA

    5. HIV peptides

    6. Altered peptide ligands

    7. Viral gene transfer vectors

    8. Antigen-modified DCs

    e. T cells

    i. Stimulate expansion of CD8+ population in vivo

    1. Systemic administration of IL-2, IL-15, IL-21

    2. Local administration of IL-12, IL-23

    ii. Block negative regulatory cytokines in vivo

    1. IL-10

    2. TGF-β

    iii. Block negative regulatory signals on T cells in vivo

    1. anti-CTLA-4

    2. anti-PD-1

    iv. Deplete regulatory T cells

    v. Stimulate positive regulatory signals on T cells in vivo

    1. OX40 agonist antibody

    2. 4-1BB agonist antibody

    vi. Adoptive transfer of in vitro activated CD8+ T cells

    1. Polyclonal

    2. Monoclonal

    3. Lymphoid depletion prior to adoptive transfer allows for "homeostatic expansion" of

    transferred lymphocytes

    7. "Polyimmunotherapy"

    a. Given that clinically relevant neoplasms have already developed the ability to mutate and thwart the host

    response, it is likely that successful attempts to eradicate the HIV will require that it be attacked

    simultaneously by several different mechanisms - akin to polychemotherapy.

    b. Stimulate expansion of CD8+ population in vivo following vaccination

    i. Systemic administration of cytokines (IL-2, IL-15, IL-21)

    ii. Local administration of IL-12

    iii. Provides HIV antigen to activate CD8+ T cells AND cytokine to promote CD8+ T cell activation /

    expansion



    c. TRICOM approach
    i. Sequential immunization with recombinant vaccinia virus and defective avipox virus containing the
    transgenes for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and a triad of T-cell costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3)
    ii. Provides HIV antigen to activate CD8+ T cells AND
    costimulatory molecules to promote CD8+ T expansion
    d. Overwijk paper approach (J Exp Med 2003; 198:569-580.)
    i. Adoptive transfer of HIV-specific T cells
    ii. Antigen-specific vaccination with altered peptide ligand (rather than native peptide)
    iii. Co-administration of T cell growth and activation factor
    iv. Provides effector cells, antigen AND cytokine to promote CD8+ T cell activation / expansion






    ** HIV-mediated** I coined this phrase -- what i mean

  • by it is the HIV produces all these molecules and proteins,
  • nef for example, without that protein that hiv produces
  • there would be no disease progression whatso ever, these
  • molecules and proteins that are in the blood that turn off
  • or down regulate the CD8 cells amoung many other things so
  • it is useful to think of HIV as a
    (3) what this means is the immune system we know supresses
  • a huge number of carcinomas every day, and it does the
  • same with hiv it suppresses perhaps 50 or 500 billion hiv
  • particles a day, as well as sweeping up all the gunk and other
  • molecules that hiv produces like nef and dozens of
  • other ones (how many are there? molecules that are
  • produced that are in blood)
    (4) Spontaneous tumor regression associated with bacterial
  • infection (4) --- this happens in HIV there is lowing of
  • viral load and T cells with different other diseases
  • and also raising of viral load also, i have read this in
  • articles, some disease reduce for short time hiv i recall
    (5) tumor rejection ...(here i would replace word tumor with
  • CD4 hiv infected cell as opposed to just any cd4 cell)
  • obviously an infected cd4 cell is not a tumor but perhaps
  • in a way it is, it can be thought of as such. only some of
  • the cd4 cells are infected, only one in one million even
  • if your viral load is high, so in HIV-mediated
  • immunosupression, the tumor = infected cd4 cells,
  • kind of a disperse, micronized broken up tumor. that is how i think of it
    (6) Occasional clinical responses to HIV vaccines (6)
  • some believe that vaccine trials need to be repeated because with
  • the cd8 cells becoming exhausted by the nef? or other
  • molecules that turns the pd-1 receptor hi, on hiv specific
  • cd8 killer cells,they stop working, so any vaccine will not work,
  • and all studies of vaccines must be repeated
  • with... immune modulators for pd-1 and or perhaps ctla etc...
    (7) same kind of thing happens with hiv

  • (8) there is an anology here to hiv also,
  • i believe but i would have to find sources
    (9) are bisphosphonate compounds or other
  • analogous compounds actived in hiv
    (10) for hiv-mediated immune suppression
  • disease the CD numbers are a different series or group
    (11) Tumor associated antigens (TAA)
  • would this become HIV CD4 infected specific antigen?
    (12) Presented to CD4 helper T cells ---
  • here is an interesting detour in the analogy that may unlock some possible ways to attack...
  • if it is presented to cd4, how can that
  • happen if many are infected
    (13) here is where we get closer into the CD4 and CD8 T cells
  • via co-stimulatory molecules ---- pd-1, ctla, etc many many others
  • postive and negative signals...

  • (14) here we are at the big pd-1 thing i write about
    (15) why isnt 14 and 15 standard treatments now,
  • it is my understanding that the drugs exist...
  • monoclonal antibodies etc or IL or various
    (16) there is an amazingly long equilibrium period
  • in hiv mediated immune distruction,
  • for example it is on aveerage 4 to 11 years long!! before significant disease states occur
  • mainly below 200 tcells
    (17)** is this what happens when the tcells begin rapid decline
  • ... both innate and adaptive become overwelmed
    (18) analogy falls apart here because, the cd4 cells
  • do not evade like cancer or better put
  • they all evade because they are actually inside the cd4 cell
  • that is what should be helping to set up immune response
  • but isnt it the nef and cd8 exhaused
  • by pd-1 being hi state, by an yet unknow protein or molecule
  • that causes the evasion???
    (19) i guess the infected CD4 cell itself
  • would be considered the tumor bed in hiv disease
    (20) in hiv disease there is an over
  • abundance overwhelming inflammatory stimulus
    (21)( this must be a huge area of
  • research and needs billions of dollars) (21)
    (22) critically important... to support CD8 expansion (22) ***










    NOTICE THIS PART 7 IS AN OUTLINE ON HOW TO TREAT HIV
    IN ANIMALS WITH THE NEWLY
    IMMERGING IMMUNE MODULATION

    so if you click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    i have created a very theoretical document that outlines how this could be done with HIV,

    should be done, now this is just a blue print for research but i think it is interesting

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 

    click here how this could apply to hiv | 



    i. Sequential immunization with recombinant vaccinia virus and defective avipox virus containing the

    transgenes for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and a triad of T-cell costimulatory molecules (B7-1,

    ICAM-1, and LFA-3)

    ii. Provides HIV antigen to activate CD8+ T cells AND costimulatory molecules to promote CD8+ T

    expansion

    d. Overwijk paper approach (J Exp Med 2003; 198:569-580.)

    i. Adoptive transfer of HIV-specific T cells

    ii. Antigen-specific vaccination with altered peptide ligand (rather than native peptide)

    iii. Co-administration of T cell growth and activation factor

    iv. Provides effector cells, antigen AND cytokine to promote CD8+ T cell activation / expansion

    8. Summary and future directions

    References

    1. Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, et. al. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape.. Nat Immunology

    2002; 3:991-998.

    2. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity 2004;

    21:137-148.

    3. Gabrilovich D and Pisarev V. Tumor escape from immune response: mechanisms and targets of activity. Current Drug

    Targets 2003; 4:525-536.

    4. Berzofsky JA, Terabe M, Oh S, et. al. Progress on new vaccine strategies for the immunotherapy and prevention of cancer.

    J Clin Invest 2004; 113:1515-25.

    5. Blattman JN and Greenberg PD. Cancer immunotherapy: a treatment for the masses. Science 2004; 305:200-205.

    All rights reserved. This document is available on-line at www.ivis.org. Document No. P1211.1104. This manuscript is

    reproduced in the IVIS website with the permission of the ACVP & ASVCP www.acvp.org